6 oktober 2023 AXTO

The content was in fact reviewed descriptively and you may analyses was in fact did having fun with SPSS application

This research are a collaboration amongst the NGO ONDa (Osservatorio Nazionale sulla salute della Donna), the fresh new journal Io Donna while the Institution out of Reproductive Health insurance and Lookup at the Business Fitness Team to achieve belief on the road off birth choice.

All of the respondents was indeed available with clear facts about the sort regarding the information becoming amassed, the point in which it absolutely was gonna be put and you will the identity of your own business holding the data. Respondents you can expect to withdraw their concur any time because of the refusing so you’re able to work regarding phone interviews. Which unknown view questionnaire is conducted according to the criteria from moral conduct proposed from the ICC/ESOMAR Code to possess personal and market research . The research try authorized by the ethics? panel of your own University out-of Florence.

Abilities

The latest survey provided 1000 female, 250 ones employed from the page of your woman?s journal Io Donna (246 through internet and you will 4 via email) and you may 750 using cellphone interviews. Most of the professionals (53.1%) was indeed between twenty five–thirty five yrs old, got additional degree (58.6%) and had given birth to 1 baby (53.7%). One of many 537 who had previously provided birth, 207 (38.5%) got knowledgeable a beneficial CS and you can 87% ones feminine () answered that the choice to execute the brand new CS got produced because of the the planning to doctor, to own scientific reasons.

Overall, 80% of the participants declared that they would prefer a vaginal birth, if they could opt for route of delivery. Preference for CS was higher among younger women; almost 35% of those < 25>35 years (Table 1). Similarly, the proportion of women with lower education who preferred CS was significantly higher than those with higher education (20.5% versus 13.4%). Women with a previous delivery were more likely to prefer vaginal delivery than those without any deliveries (82.3% versus 77.3%). Within the group of over 500 women with previous births, those without a previous CS were even more likely to prefer a vaginal delivery than women who had undergone at least one previous CS (94.2% versus 60.0%, respectively).

The 3 rd statement on the higher proportion from arrangement (75.2%) to have preferring a genital beginning are that the woman realized she you certainly will manage the pain with it. Most other comments with high costs away from agreement (approximately 70%) was in fact one vaginal beginning are a more absolute, non-surgical, technique for delivering, it left zero mark and that it was faster fantastically dull in the post-partum period. A relatively shorter number of people (64%) common a vaginal beginning as partner was expose or because generated medical convenient. Not even half (41.2%) of your own professionals my Mao wife assented you to the taste to possess a genital beginning is because enjoy these to have a bigger amount of children than simply CS.

Approximately 40% agreed which they well-known a great CS since it greeting a faster go back to sexual craft, otherwise while they got a beneficial accounts from family relations who had put by this channel or while they by themselves got an earlier CS

Certainly female preferring a beneficial CS, 77% highly assented or decided that they feared the pain sensation away from delivery and 74.5% highly consented otherwise assented one to a real reason for preferring CS is the genuine convenience of arranging the fresh new birth (Shape 2). Almost two-thirds (64%) of one’s women that popular good CS highly arranged otherwise agreed that this route out-of delivery are safer on the mother and you may that it triggered smaller distress towards child. The fresh new report towards low rate regarding contract among women who common to deliver using CS was since hospital given no epidurals to have genital deliveries (thirty two.3%).